Part 2 cue cardMedia & culture

Describe a film you enjoyed watching

Same discipline as the book card — plot summary is the trap, response is the answer.

The cue card

Describe a film you enjoyed watching.

You should say

  • what it was about
  • where you watched it
  • who you watched it with
  • and explain why you enjoyed it

1 minute to prepare · up to 2 minutes to speak

How to fill the two minutes

Four beats, not four answers. The prompts on the card are a scaffold — a turn that flows past them scores better than four disconnected replies.

  1. Title, genre, and when and where you watched it.
  2. The premise in two or three sentences. Practise the compression.
  3. One scene you remember precisely, described as an image.
  4. What you liked and who you'd recommend it to.

Vocabulary this card invites

Lexical resource is a quarter of your band, and band 7 explicitly allows the occasional wrong word — playing it safe with plain vocabulary is what keeps people at 6.

it's based on

for adaptations — a quick way to give context

the cinematography

precise register, and few candidates use it

a plot twist

the standard collocation

gripping

stronger and more natural than 'very interesting'

it had me in tears

concrete emotional response

it stands up to a rewatch

a considered judgement rather than a rating

The trap on this card

Narrating the plot from beginning to end, including the ending.

Three sentences of plot maximum. The card says 'explain why you enjoyed it' — that's a different question from what happens in it.

A band 8 answer, and why it works

Read this to see the moves, not to learn the words. An examiner hears memorised answers every working day and it shows up in your fluency score — the hesitation pattern of someone reciting is nothing like the pattern of someone thinking. The details below are invented; yours should be your own.

The film I'd talk about is one I saw fairly recently called Past Lives, which I went to knowing almost nothing about, which I'd recommend as a way of watching films. It follows two people who were close as children in Korea, are separated when one emigrates, and then reconnect at intervals across about twenty-four years. Very little happens in it, in the sense of events. What I found remarkable is that it's a film about a decision nobody in it ever quite makes, and it manages to be tense the whole way through without any conflict in the ordinary sense. I watched it with a friend who found it slow and we've disagreed about it ever since, quite enjoyably. What stayed with me was the ending, which I won't describe, except to say it does the thing where almost nothing is said and it's completely devastating. I've thought about it more than films I'd have said at the time I enjoyed more.

What earns the band

What Part 3 asks next

Part 3 is loosely tied to your long turn, but the questions turn abstract — about people in general rather than about you. This card usually leads into:

How to handle the Part 3 discussion

Other media & culture cards

Browse every cue card

Speak this one out loud

Oliver will read you a card, wait out your preparation minute, and then say nothing at all for two minutes — which is the part you cannot rehearse alone. The report afterwards scores fluency, vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation separately. The first test is free.

This guide is written from the publicly published IELTS Speaking band descriptors, in our own words. For the official wording, see the British Council's band descriptors. MockLive AI is an independent practice tool and is not affiliated with IELTS, the British Council, IDP or Cambridge Assessment English.